Tuesday, February 16, 2010

MacWorld 2010

At first I did not think I would find the time to make it, but I did, and on a Saturday mind you. Last week was MacWorld 2010 in San Francisco. I went into the show this year not expecting much. I've become accustom to the rapid decline in attendance and quality of trade shows recently. That combined with the fact that Apple was not present, and Adobe not really welcome. I thought the show would be a little light. The show was actually pretty well attended, but the quality of the exhibitors not great. A lot of useless, almost Microsft'ish type clutter: mice, cases, keyboards with silly color coding systems that I'm still trying to figure out the point of and why that would make me more efficient, and an app pavilion that was so scrunched it was impossible to get an idea of what was even going on. There were a few things I would note from the show however.

Eye-Fi. I just like these guys, I like what they are doing, and I am impressed with the technology. Eye-Fi has a product that combines software and hardware embedded on an SD card to give you a way to automatically transfer photos and video from camera to your favorite location as soon as a Wi-Fi connection is available. There are several obvious limitations, but the future potential is outstanding. I don't like that they are tied to the DCIM file-system, but I'm sure that can be overcome.

Fujitsu ScanSnap + Evernote. Really played up their new scanning functionality. I like Everynote's App, but I don't like how proprietary it is. It is not easy ( takes a hack ) to get your documents out of the application. What if you need to use the data somewhere else, or heaven forbid need to migrate? They combined with Fujitsu's talk about there scanner profile on the ScanSnap to scan directly to Evernote now have created a complete personal content management system.

Neat Receipts. Always been a fan of the product. The particular scanner they use I'm very familiar with and have worked with directly on an OEM level. The great part about the scanner is not so much the quality of scan but the form-factor and convenience. As did all the other scanner guys, Neat talked mostly, not about the scanner, but about the software bundled with it. They also have a personal content management system or file cabinet application and they play up their recognition quality. Unfortunately optical character recognition ( OCR ) on the Mac is still not ported to the best version available on PC, so the quality is not great. I found it interesting in the time I was waiting to say hello how many complaints I heard about the business card ( BCR ) and receipt reading accuracy. I felt bad for the guys, but not too much. Vendors like Neat, ReadIRIS, etc. have painted a picture for end-users that is completely incorrect and they of course expect the reading of business cards and receipts to be very accurate, when actually on the desktop level it usually is not. They only hurt themselves with bad market education.

And finally, Microsoft. I found it humors there sarcastic marketing against Apple. Re-iterates the love-hate relationship that exists. It's like two brothers, one makes all the money off what the other creates. They know it, I know it, but we still pretend.

Not too much was said about the iPad at the show. Some companies quickly incorporated a photo or two into their marketing. And there was an amazing lack of Chotchkies. I Covered the show in 1.5 hours, and did not feel bad about the lack of effort. I doubt MacWorld will ever be what it was, but I'm hoping that next year brings more technology and less cases and accessories.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Chris Riley at 0 Comments

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Don't over think business card scanning

I am amused at the detail of thought and complexity people put into business card scanning, BCR. In my time in the enterprise content management industry, I've scanned hundreds of thousands of business cards. Yes I know that is a lot, and no I'm not that popular. A vast majority of the scanning was for testing of business card scanners, and OCR/BCR technology to read them. But what cards I do want to keep are scanned and stored for later retrieval. I DO NOT use a specific card scanner, nor do I use a special card scanning application. I truly keep it simple and in my experience this is the right right way to do it.

Card scanners are inexpensive and useful when all you are scanning are business cards, but why not scan all your documents? ADF feed document scanners today support feed trays that dial down to the size of business cards. They are also able to scan stacks of business cards, front and back without a problem. So all I need is one scanner for all my documents. After extensive testing, the image quality difference is negligible, and in the top 3 are leading desktop scanners which are actually higher.

Now that you have the image, how do you get the data? Most people want to use a dedicated BCR technology to extract each data element from the card. I too am very amused with this and have had fun setting up systems to do it. But as a practicality, it does not make much sense to me. BCR that extracts separate fields such as name, email etc. can be very accurate. But when it's not accurate it's a problem. It takes a lot of time to correct a problem if it occurs, but more often then not, you don't even know the problem occurred so you get part of an address in the phone number field and miss the phone number completely for example. You will only know this is the case when it's time to follow-up with people. My second practicality complaint is that you are adding one program to operate and use regularly. We all have our favorite email client, or CRM where we keep all our contacts. Most BCR applications promote their ability to export to the most popular email clients, but as soon as there is an update to your database application you also have to buy a new version or might be stuck. Some BCR applications do not even allow the export of data so you have to manually copy and paste anyway. Is this really necessary?

OK it's only fair now for me to tell you how I do it. I scan my business cards with my ADF fed document scanner to a hot-folder. This hot-folder is watched by a Full-Page OCR system and the cards are automatically converted to search-able PDFs. I am not getting field data and I'm not saving into a separate application. I'm making search-able PDFs just like all my other documents. This has worked for me very well for the past 4 years. When it comes time for me to find someone, all I really want is to see the card and the info. Most likely, if it's really important I've already emailed them and captured their information that way. With my system I can search for people, websites, company names, even topics to find the cards of the people I want. I don't have to worry about searching in a special UI field by field. Nor do I have to worry about missing data as full-text does not fall to the mercy of field extraction, it gets everything that is readable. In the areas of business where card scanning is used for reading medical insurance cards and drivers licenses the technology is very useful and necessary. I'm speaking only of personal business card scanning

In my experience most users of card scanners and BCR application use them very actively for a period of a month or two and soon the use dies to nothing and they revert to manual entry. I'm not doing manual entry, I'm using the latest technology in one unified process and full-text search. I'm just keeping it simple and practical.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Chris Riley at 0 Comments